A small, senior
engineering firm.
Built differently on purpose.
No bench. No internal sales org. No "we'll bring in a senior" stage gate. The engineers you meet are the engineers on the work. The platform compounds in the background.
Engineering leverage. Not engineering headcount.
Most engineering firms scale by adding people. A new client means a new bench. A larger engagement means more juniors under a senior banner. The economics work because utilization works — and utilization works because the firm can always find another billable hour to fill.
We chose a different shape. The firm scales by adding leverage: a proprietary AI platform, reusable agents and playbooks, the seven-graph governance surface that became ArchTrace, the lineage spine that became PlanTrace. Hiring is selective and senior — additions are made around the platform, not around the next engagement.
The visible part of that choice is what we don't do. No bench. No internal sales organisation. No multi-tier delivery model. No "we'll bring in a senior architect for the cutover" stage gate. The price of an engagement is the price of the named team, in writing, before the work starts.
The structural part is the more interesting one. A firm built on headcount needs to keep its people billable, which determines what kind of work it can say no to — which is to say, not much. A firm built on leverage can afford to be selective about the work, because the work isn't the only thing the firm is. That selectivity is, in practice, the entire reason a client would prefer us to a larger vendor.
The platform isn't a product line on the side. It is the central asset, extended by every engagement and licensed back into every engagement. When the next migration starts further down the road than the last one did, the savings flow to the client. When the platform gets stronger, every engineer in the firm gets faster. That's the compounding mechanic. It is the entire reason the model works.
Where IVBIS sits in the actual market.
A short comparison against the two categories the buyer is otherwise weighing us against. We don't claim to win on everything — only on the column shape that matches the kind of work we take.
Two products. One governance spine.
Deterministic architecture governance for codebases that ship with AI.
Seven named graphs. SHACL shapes. SARIF output. Drop-in for Claude Code.
Explore ArchTrace →Plans that trace back to the PRD.
Every plan item links to its source. Approved plans export to Jira, Azure DevOps, Linear, CSV/JSON.
Explore PlanTrace →Five rules we run the firm by.
Published because they are meant to be falsifiable. If you ever see us doing the opposite of one in an engagement, the page is wrong — and we'll fix the page or the behavior, but not keep both.
Small team. Strong engineers. Compounding platform.
Start with a sentence about what you're trying to build, modernize, or unbreak.
We reply within two business days.